Re: Google Secure Access

From: David Taylor (davidt-news_at_yadt.co.uk)
Date: 09/25/05 

Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 11:13:04 +0000 (UTC)

tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote on 24 Sep 2005 20:36:28 -0700:
>
> Yeah congrats. I tried the wrong URL.

So no apology for your accusation that he was lying?
 
> This doesn't change the fact you're reproducing COPYRIGHTED material
> without permission and are obtuse to the ability of providing a link to
> the FAQ itself.

Oh for Gods sake, its an FAQ. He provided a link to a site that
includes a link to the FAQ. You fucked up and used the wrong URL,
deal with it.
 
> Frankly this doesn't sound like ANY SORT of solution to the "wifi"
> problem which isn't eavesdropping but rogue APs. I mean anyone with
> half a brain can use SSH to make a SOCKS proxy and use that to access
> the web, email, IM.

I don't think that was claimed by the original post. In fact I think
the original post was suggesting it was a bad idea to send ALL your
traffic via google.
 
> But that doesn't help you when what you think is the airport AP you are
> entering your credit card info into is actually someone beside you in
> the lounge phishing you.

No one claimed it did. Perhaps you should direct your criticism
at google?
 
> So I stand by my original post in that you should learn to link
> properly,

He did.

> not violate peoples copyrights

I'm sure google will be most upset.

> and see things for what they are [e.g. this is a waste of fucking time].

Noone claimed it wasn't. FFS, is "sorry", so hard to say? 

-- 
David Taylor
Quantcast