Re: RSA encryption/decryption
From: Pubkeybreaker (Robert_silverman_at_raytheon.com)
Date: 09/19/05
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: RSA encryption/decryption"
- Previous message: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: RSA encryption/decryption"
- In reply to: Milan VXdgsvt: "Re: RSA encryption/decryption"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: RSA encryption/decryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 19 Sep 2005 11:00:18 -0700
"Was I've said is one bit means about 2 times the work, or less with a
better algorithm, but still somewhat close to that.
So factoring a 4096 bit number takes 2^(4096-512) times [the time to
factor a 512 bit number]. "
Bzzt. False. Please go study before making further cretinous
pronouncements.
4096 bits takes about L(2^4096)/L(2^512) times as much work,
where
L(n) = exp( (c +o(1)) ( (log n)^1/3 (loglog n)^2/3)) and c ~ 1.9
is the time
complexity function for NFS.
4096 bits is about 3.4 x 10^27 times as hard as 512 bits, not
2^3584 ~ 7.8 x 10^1078 times as hard.
- Next message: Mxsmanic: "Re: RSA encryption/decryption"
- Previous message: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: RSA encryption/decryption"
- In reply to: Milan VXdgsvt: "Re: RSA encryption/decryption"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: RSA encryption/decryption"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|