Re: what password encryption method is this?
From: none (_at_(none))
Date: 08/31/05
- Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: My my, how time flies ...... it's been about "1 hour" -- anyone cracked CryptoSMS yet?"
- Previous message: Mike Amling: "Re: Are there problems with Merkle-Damgaard and SHA-256?"
- In reply to: Gregory G Rose: "Re: what password encryption method is this?"
- Next in thread: B-Con: "Re: what password encryption method is this?"
- Reply: B-Con: "Re: what password encryption method is this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:44:06 +1200
Gregory G Rose wrote:
> I believe these are Base-64 encoded output from
> MD5. The $1$$ means something special, but I've
> forgotten exactly what; in essence, though, it
> says to use the new password scheme not the
> original Unix one. The other 22 characters
> represent 6 bits per character, and expand to 132
> bits, of which only the first 128 are used.
>
> Have fun cracking...
>
> Greg.
I beleive that some of it is the salt?
Greg Other
- Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: My my, how time flies ...... it's been about "1 hour" -- anyone cracked CryptoSMS yet?"
- Previous message: Mike Amling: "Re: Are there problems with Merkle-Damgaard and SHA-256?"
- In reply to: Gregory G Rose: "Re: what password encryption method is this?"
- Next in thread: B-Con: "Re: what password encryption method is this?"
- Reply: B-Con: "Re: what password encryption method is this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
