Re: Theoretical limits for password length
From: Paul Rubin (//phr.cx_at_NOSPAM.invalid)
Date: 08/27/05
- Next message: mobius30: "Re: The importance of IVs"
- Previous message: Regis: "Re: The importance of IVs"
- In reply to: Milan VXdgsvt: "Re: Theoretical limits for password length"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: Theoretical limits for password length"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Theoretical limits for password length"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 27 Aug 2005 12:16:13 -0700
"Milan VXdgsvt" <milan_vxdgsvt@seznam.cz> writes:
> So what you are saying is that a quantum computer still needs 2^(N/2)
> operations to invert a N-bit hash function?
That's the best known generic result. See "Grover's algorithm".
- Next message: mobius30: "Re: The importance of IVs"
- Previous message: Regis: "Re: The importance of IVs"
- In reply to: Milan VXdgsvt: "Re: Theoretical limits for password length"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: Theoretical limits for password length"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Theoretical limits for password length"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]