Re: Question about hashing algorithms
Crypto_at_S.M.S
Date: 08/27/05
- Next message: \: "Re: My my, how time flies ...... it's been about "1 hour" -- anyone cracked CryptoSMS yet?"
- Previous message: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: My my, how time flies ...... it's been about "1 hour" -- anyone cracked CryptoSMS yet?"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Question about hashing algorithms"
- Next in thread: Luc The Perverse: "Re: Question about hashing algorithms"
- Reply: Luc The Perverse: "Re: Question about hashing algorithms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 08:07:55 +1000
David Wagner wrote:
>>Are any hashing algorithms that are secure for short data and have
>>short signatures? As I understand it, SHA-1, MD5, etc. were pretty
>>much designed to work for any size of data. Sometimes that seems like
>>overkill, though.
>
>
> What's wrong with overkill? (a serious question)
>
Overkill is a wonderful idea, but many in this newsgroup view it as
"inefficient".
- Next message: \: "Re: My my, how time flies ...... it's been about "1 hour" -- anyone cracked CryptoSMS yet?"
- Previous message: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: My my, how time flies ...... it's been about "1 hour" -- anyone cracked CryptoSMS yet?"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Question about hashing algorithms"
- Next in thread: Luc The Perverse: "Re: Question about hashing algorithms"
- Reply: Luc The Perverse: "Re: Question about hashing algorithms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|