Re: My my, how time flies ...... it's been about "1 hour" -- anyone cracked CryptoSMS yet?

Crypto_at_S.M.S
Date: 08/26/05 

Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:52:07 +1000

Joe Peschel wrote:

> " \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in
> news:%J6Pe.46$lN6.1386@news.uswest.net:
>
>
>>Joe Peschel wrote:
>>
>>>" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in
>>>news:7r6Pe.42$lN6.1386@news.uswest.net:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Well, it's been about "1 hour" since...
>>>
>>>Has Crypto@S.M.S posted the source code, yet?
>>
>>Funny, Joe Ashwood didn't mention anything
>>about needing any "source code" to crack the messages.
>>
>
>
> No, but I did. And if Crypto@SMS provided an executable (not one that uses
> only a short key, but the real thing) that runs on a PC would be good, too.
> Let's see how uncrackable CryptoSMS really is.
>
> Did you notice that Crypto@S.M.S has not agreed to post the source code,
> yet?
>
> J
>
>

Yes, I have noticed. I have also noticed how all claims of weakness
said nothing about requiring source code to mount an attack. Are you
backpedalling now, and claiming that CryptoSMS can not be cracked
"within the hour" unless you have the source code?

If you want a free copy of CryptoSMS, i.e. "the real thing",
just make a request for a beta tester registration. Those
are free, good for life, and will get you all the full strength
executables you want. It is all explained in detail at WWW.CryptoSMS.COM.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: =?Iso-8859-1?Q?Zuverl=E4ssiges?= DVD Brennprogramm (Ubuntu 8.10)
    ... das zum Erstellen des Executables von Nöten ist, ... Solltest Du diesen Unsinn ernsthaft glauben, ... der keinerlei Software nutzen kann an der GPL Code ... | source code, which must be distributed under the terms of Sections ...
    (de.comp.os.unix.linux.misc)
  • RE: License question
    ... >> you don't have the source code to it. ... > that the firmware is not executed by the same processor that runs Linux, ... with respect to executables. ... If you release a package under the GPL that ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: What Assembly Language Should I Use?
    ... source code from the same place satisfies the requirement to ... Emphasis on "the same place" here; in other words, you need to offer the ability to download the NASM source you built your executable from from the same download site. ... the GPL proper has a specific exception for non-commercial distribution: ... Are the 'bots and humans d/l'ing more Windows executables than dos32 executables? ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: An interesting way of keeping track of versions
    ... that's what version control systems are for. ... source code has been a functionality that version control systems have had for, crikey, decades. ...   implicit none ... The executables are a red herring here - although it is the executable ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)
  • Re: Move RDP from PUBLIC to BSP
    ... To cloen the source code from PUBLIC into BSP, ... How do I get the final executables build? ... > Of course, I should also change RELEASETYPE to PLATFORM, but then the libs ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsce.platbuilder)