Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]
tomstdenis_at_gmail.com
Date: 08/26/05
- Next message: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Does anyone have some contacts at government crypto agencies?"
- Previous message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: The Chinese MD5 attack"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 25 Aug 2005 17:38:33 -0700
tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote:
> Andrew Swallow wrote:
> > tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > If I didn't buy this Intel box solely for benchmarking I'd be really
> > > pissed at it's craptacular performance. I mean when a single core
> > > AMD64 [cheaper than the EMT64 core] can beat things like AES and RSA
> > > often by huge margins ... you know there are problems..
> >
> > Multi-core machines assume that reading from and writing
> > to main memory is rare. Or put it another way, if you
> > need more than one mega byte of shared memory a single
> > core machine will normally be faster. (There are
> > special cases like where one of the processors is
> > the disk controller and the program is in private
> > memory.)
>
> That'd be an interesting fact except my AMD64 is a dual-core. Running
> single thread tasks it gets roughly the performance of a single-core
> AMD64. Obviously there is overhead from even something like an idle
> thread...
Whoops, context here... [sorry for the confusion]
My comment was that dual-core RSA [using two parallel threads] on the
nocona is STILL SLOWER than a single-core AMD64 running RSA. A
dual-core AMD64 just murders it [>2x faster].
The AMD64 scales nicely with multiple cores, though so does the P4. I
get nearly 2x the speed from my dual-core RSA plugin for LibTomCrypt on
the nocona. So if the ALU itself wasn't so pathetic this might have
been a contender :-)
Tom
- Next message: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Does anyone have some contacts at government crypto agencies?"
- Previous message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: The Chinese MD5 attack"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|