Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]
tomstdenis_at_gmail.com
Date: 08/25/05
- Next message: claribel_s_at_40networks.com: "posting 20050824"
- Previous message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]"
- Next in thread: Francois Grieu: "Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]"
- Reply: Francois Grieu: "Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 24 Aug 2005 20:31:44 -0700
Paul Rubin wrote:
> I thought there were some Pentiums now with AMD64 instructions.
EMT64 == x86_64
New graphs just for RSA-1024 including my dual-core RSA on the
Nocona...
Normalized clock to 1.8Ghz
http://libtomcrypt.org/rsa_1024_norm.png
Raw data
http://libtomcrypt.org/rsa_1024_raw.png
Yes, that's right. A 32-bit Athlon-XP **LAPTOP** using TFM with slow
memory [it was last measured at a mere 460MiB/sec] can match the 64-bit
Necona using SSL [TFM isn't that much faster than the AMD32] with twice
the cache and way faster memory.
Again the clock rate is helping a bit [if you look at the raw] but even
then the AMD64 floors the Necona when running 600Mhz slower.
Tom
- Next message: claribel_s_at_40networks.com: "posting 20050824"
- Previous message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]"
- Next in thread: Francois Grieu: "Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]"
- Reply: Francois Grieu: "Re: Nocona [Intel 64-bit cpu timing]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Loading