Re: A Fast New Hash Function
Crypto_at_S.M.S
Date: 08/21/05
- Next message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Fast New Hash Function"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: OAEP"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Fast New Hash Function"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Fast New Hash Function"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Fast New Hash Function"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 05:08:19 +1000
tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote:
> JiXian Yang wrote:
>
>>Thank you very much for your comment.
>>
>>The comment is very important, I will modify the paper.
>
>
> How so? None of your results are correct or important. You don't
> have anything to write a paper ABOUT let alone "modify".
>
> Instead of just looking for the latest key-phrases to throw in a
> document and then claim "this is the solution" why not spend the time
> to learn/ask questions about the material?
>
> For example, if you had simply asked here what a wide-trail was I would
> have gladly explained it.
>
Ask questions?
Aren't you the same Tom who tells people to quit asking questions?
- Next message: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Fast New Hash Function"
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: OAEP"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Fast New Hash Function"
- Next in thread: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Fast New Hash Function"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: A Fast New Hash Function"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|