Re: Re-secured Algorithm?
From: Harlan Lieberman-Berg (sysadmin_at_tacticalbusinesspartners.com)
Date: 08/19/05
- Next message: Harlan Lieberman-Berg: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Previous message: Unruh: "Re: The Chinese MD5 attack"
- In reply to: Regis: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Next in thread: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Reply: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Reply: Regis: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 19:05:50 -0400
> Oh good lord...not another one to jump on the "broken" bandwagon..
Sir, I take offense at that remark. I never said that it was insecure for
use. I simply said that it is 'broken'. Meaning, it can be cracked
faster than brute force. It's time to start looking for alternatives,
since it will only get worse from this point on.
- Next message: Harlan Lieberman-Berg: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Previous message: Unruh: "Re: The Chinese MD5 attack"
- In reply to: Regis: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Next in thread: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Reply: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Reply: Regis: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
