Re-secured Algorithm?
From: Harlan Lieberman-Berg (sysadmin_at_tacticalbusinesspartners.com)
Date: 08/18/05
- Next message: googlegr.1000.spamatron_at_spamgourmet.net: "Re: Cross-platform encryption tool?"
- Previous message: kennedy77_at_charter.net: "Re: boiled egg cipher"
- Next in thread: Regis: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Reply: Regis: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Reply: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Maybe reply: Regis: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Maybe reply: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:36:58 -0400
Hey guys. Due to the recent compromise designed against sha1, and DSA
requires SHA1 to be completely secure, DSA can be broken. Therefore, would
it be reasonable to, until DSA-2 comes out, to hash with SHA-2 and encrypt
the hash with the private key using Elgamal creating a signature?
- Next message: googlegr.1000.spamatron_at_spamgourmet.net: "Re: Cross-platform encryption tool?"
- Previous message: kennedy77_at_charter.net: "Re: boiled egg cipher"
- Next in thread: Regis: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Reply: Regis: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Reply: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Reply: Kristian Gjøsteen: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Maybe reply: Regis: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Maybe reply: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Re-secured Algorithm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
