Re: message digest of large files
From: Mike Amling (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 08/18/05
- Next message: Alan: "Re: Simple solution to the Diffie Hellman MITM attack"
- Previous message: Mike Amling: "Re: message digest of large files"
- In reply to: bryanjugglercryptographer_at_yahoo.com: "Re: message digest of large files"
- Next in thread: hdjang_at_gmail.com: "Re: message digest of large files"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:39:40 GMT
bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com wrote:
> Mike Amling wrote:
>
>> Both SHA1 and MD5 are defined for inputs of up to (2**64)-1 bits.
>
>
> Right for SHA-1, but MD5 takes input of arbitrary length.
>
> The algorithm takes as input a message of arbitrary length
> and produces [...] [RFC 1321, Section 1]
>
> In the unlikely event that b is greater than 2^64, then only
> the low-order 64 bits of b are used. [RFC 1321, Section 3.2,
> Step 2]
>
> Hmmm, that should probably read, 'greather than *or equal to*'.
> Oh well, it's broken anyway.
Thanks for clarifying that.
--Mike Amling
- Next message: Alan: "Re: Simple solution to the Diffie Hellman MITM attack"
- Previous message: Mike Amling: "Re: message digest of large files"
- In reply to: bryanjugglercryptographer_at_yahoo.com: "Re: message digest of large files"
- Next in thread: hdjang_at_gmail.com: "Re: message digest of large files"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|