Re: RSA question
From: Regis (nobody_at_thisaddress.com)
Date: 08/11/05
- Next message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Rijndael: IV Required for Decryption?"
- Previous message: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: Big Prime number prolem."
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: RSA question"
- Next in thread: Sebastian Gottschalk: "Re: RSA question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:24:35 -0400
On 11 Aug 2005 08:32:23 -0700, tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote:
>And you think you're somehow contributing by returning the favour?
I love how you deviate from the fact that you were wrong with your
accusing ME of attacking HIM. Let's just completely ignore the fact
that it was HE who attacked me, right?
In your oh-so-brilliant and superior mind, what do you think I should
have done? Just sat there and said nothing while somebody called me
"fucked up" for absolutely no reason and without provocation?
Maybe you're perfectly content in living your life as a patsy, but I
myself have a spine. If someone's going to attack me unprovoked, I'm
going to stand up for myself and tell him where to go. This is
especially true when it's some dweeb from a newsgroup playing the role
of keyboard-superhero.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
- Next message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Rijndael: IV Required for Decryption?"
- Previous message: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: Big Prime number prolem."
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: RSA question"
- Next in thread: Sebastian Gottschalk: "Re: RSA question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|