Re: Rijndael: IV Required for Decryption?
From: MikeP (mprocopio_at_gmail.com)
Date: 08/11/05
- Previous message: 1_at_2.3: "Re: Big Prime number prolem."
- In reply to: Damien: "Re: Rijndael: IV Required for Decryption?"
- Next in thread: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Rijndael: IV Required for Decryption?"
- Reply: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Rijndael: IV Required for Decryption?"
- Reply: Damien: "Re: Rijndael: IV Required for Decryption?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 11 Aug 2005 01:41:53 -0700
Interesting... Upon closer inspection of the code, I think (not
positive) that the IV is in fact being stored as the first block in the
encrypted data segment... which would explain why the decryption
routine skips the first block. I think that storing the IV in the
beginning of the sequence would cause the algorithm to not match test
vectors, if this is not a standard practice. Author states that
algorithm conforms to test vectors.
Still, we're getting side tracked! I can figure out what the algorithm
is doing. The main question is, fundamentally, is the IV used for
decryption? Where and when does this occur?
- Previous message: 1_at_2.3: "Re: Big Prime number prolem."
- In reply to: Damien: "Re: Rijndael: IV Required for Decryption?"
- Next in thread: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Rijndael: IV Required for Decryption?"
- Reply: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Rijndael: IV Required for Decryption?"
- Reply: Damien: "Re: Rijndael: IV Required for Decryption?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|