Re: Using The Internet To Store Data

From: Richard Herring (junk_at_[
Date: 08/10/05

  • Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: crypto puzzle murder mystery"
    Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:07:44 +0100

    In message <1123688789.d8d2add75f79ae92c047100ea3696267@teranews>, Jan
    Panteltje <> writes
    >On a sunny day (Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:56:07 +0100) it happened Richard Herring
    ><junk@[]> wrote in <>:
    >>In message <1123684878.fc240c27e0ddca825ffa6c07f8d149b0@teranews>, Jan
    >>Panteltje <> writes
    >>>On a sunny day (10 Aug 2005 06:49:35 -0700) it happened
    >>> wrote in
    >>>>Andrew Swallow wrote:
    >>>>> Alan Connor wrote:
    >>>>> > On alt.privacy.anon-server, in
    >>>>> ><pcdKe.3823$>, "Alan Connor"
    >>>>> >
    >>>>> [snip]
    >>>>> > Posting from google is for clueless windoze-weenies playing
    >>>>> > with their Mommy's computer.
    >>>>> >
    >>>>> > Because they usually post from somewhere else and are trying
    >>>>> > to evade my killfile?
    >>>>> AOL decided to "improve" the service it gives its customers. It stopped
    >>>>> them accessing internet Newsgroups, except those AOL is the monopoly
    >>>>> supplier of.
    >>>>> Knowledgeable AOL users who wish to overcome its maliciously unfit for
    >>>>> purpose product can do so by reading and writing through Google Groups.
    >>>>(Careful with that logical argument - you're setting yourself up for a
    >>>>punishment killfiling ;-( )
    >>>>Some posters are compelled to use servers which drop anything
    >>>>crossposted to groups they don't carry. Using Google as I'm doing now
    >>>>is the only way to post to such threads.
    >>>>Some posters are behind corporate firewalls which insert nonsensical
    >>>>disclaimers in outgoing emails, imposing impossible conditions on the
    >>>>moderators of moderated groups. Again, using Google is the only way
    >>>>under those circumstances to post to such groups.
    >>>>From experience:
    >>Fine if you can do it. Which parts of "compelled" and "firewall" did you

    >What part of networks do you not understand?
    >New to Usenet?

    Hardly ;-)

    >Read up on networking!

    *You'd* do better to read up on phrases like "corporate security
    policy", with particular attention to "disciplinary offence" and
    "instant dismissal".

    >Why not set up a small relay? Perhaps at home?

    Technical solution to a social problem. Rarely satisfactory.

    >Firewalls burn very well.

    So do those who are logged trying to break them.

    Richard Herring

  • Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: crypto puzzle murder mystery"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Creating a capabilities-based restricted execution system
      ... > proxies to implement capabilities. ... > attention on mechanism before policy, ... I don't see any unsolvable problems. ...
    • Re: details about EOL (of FreeBSD 5.4) ?
      ... what list/channel/forum should I have been paying more attention to? ... Running EOL server parts is against policy. ... Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator ...
    • Re: Bleedingheartism [was: American Bleedingheartism]
      ... How do they manage to be in the center of policy without being ... I'd describe anyone recognised as an authority in a field ... one pays any attention to them? ... attention to the authorities in the field, ...
    • Re: dont mess with Bobke
      ... I just wasn't paying close enough attention. ... attention to the commentary about Mayo (who definitely lost his bottle ... today), but all the phrases were so dull, Adrian Karstens could have ... Although when Rasmussen in his resplendent yellow jersey overtook ...