Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?
Crypto_at_S.M.S
Date: 08/04/05
- Next message: BRG: "Re: Algorithms to generate permutations"
- Previous message: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Sometimes Terrorists can be Unimaginative"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Next in thread: Terry Ritter: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Reply: Terry Ritter: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:49:04 +1000
Tom St Denis wrote:
> Terry Ritter wrote:
>
>>>The end result of a multiple encryption of cipher A, B, and C is the cipher
>>>ABC, a single cipher that, in effect, is now the "single point of failure."
>>
>>Obviously not: The cipher composed of ciphers
>>A, B, and C still has ciphers B and C active
>>when cipher A fails. That is the redundancy
>>which specifically addresses the "single point
>>of failure" problem. So if A has been broken
>>in secret, I still win.
>
>
> More nonsense. Who says this magical new attack only applies to A?
>
> Add fire element!!!! make it hot!!!!
>
> This isn't alchemy!
>
> Tom
>
And who says it doesn't. Nobody knows for sure.
This uncertainty is one of the many reasons for using multi crypto.
- Next message: BRG: "Re: Algorithms to generate permutations"
- Previous message: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Sometimes Terrorists can be Unimaginative"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Next in thread: Terry Ritter: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Reply: Terry Ritter: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|