Re: Algorithms to generate permutations

Crypto_at_S.M.S
Date: 08/04/05 

Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 16:52:03 +1000

Joe Peschel wrote:
> Crypto@S.M.S wrote in news:11f3c1rdck47g8d@news.supernews.com:
>
>
>>Joe Peschel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Crypto@S.M.S wrote in news:11eur20nnm50s39@news.supernews.com:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Unruh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>I am certainly not saying this to defend the position of Crypto@S.M.S
>>>>>but to point out that claims of no support are exagerated.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Much has been exaggerated in statements about these supposed
>>>>weaknesses in CryptoSMS, and when you point this out, you are
>>>>defending CryptoSMS whether you intend to or not.
>>>
>>>
>>>No, Bill isn't defending your position. He even says so.
>>>
>>>J
>>>
>>>
>>
>>He may not have intended to, but that was the result of his statement,
>>because so much has been exaggerated here in Sci.Crypt with regard to
>>weaknesses "discovered" in CryptSMS.
>>
>
>
> Except he said, "claims of no support are exagerated." Big difference.
>
> J
>

Claims of no support for what are exaggerated?
My impression is he meant that claims of no support for multiple
encryption are exaggerated. Yes, it is a big difference.

Maybe he can clarify, since neither of us should be putting words in
his mouth.

Relevant Pages