Re: Algorithms to generate permutations
From: Joe Peschel (jpeschel_at_no.spam.org)
Date: 08/03/05
- Next message: kooshiar_at_gmail.com: "Re: cryptography conferences ranking"
- Previous message: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Algorithms to generate permutations"
- In reply to: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Algorithms to generate permutations"
- Next in thread: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Algorithms to generate permutations"
- Reply: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Algorithms to generate permutations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 06:27:58 -0000
Crypto@S.M.S wrote in news:11f0noj28pl5fa9@news.supernews.com:
>
> Deprecating any thing for any reason, without cause, is generally
> considered to be an insult.
No, it isn't. One cannot insult a program.
> Citing "weaknesses" in encryption software
> can also be seen as an insult, when you fail to adequately demonstrate
> your claims.
Again, one cannot insult a program.
>
> Unsubstantiated deprecations are always insults.
>
Well -- no. See my comments above.
J
-- __________________________________________ http://www.impeach-bush-now.org Joe Peschel D.O.E. SysWorks http://members.aol.com/jpeschel/index.htm __________________________________________
- Next message: kooshiar_at_gmail.com: "Re: cryptography conferences ranking"
- Previous message: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Algorithms to generate permutations"
- In reply to: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Algorithms to generate permutations"
- Next in thread: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Algorithms to generate permutations"
- Reply: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Algorithms to generate permutations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
