Re: *secure* (non-OTP) pencil and paper systems ?
From: Mike Amling (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 08/01/05
- Next message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Using MGF1 for key generation"
- Previous message: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: Barcode Email"
- In reply to: vedaal: "*secure* (non-OTP) pencil and paper systems ?"
- Next in thread: Joe Peschel: "Re: *secure* (non-OTP) pencil and paper systems ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 21:53:54 GMT
vedaal wrote:
> are there any (non-OTP) pencil-and-paper systems that are 'secure',
You could try VMPC shrunken down to a deck or two of playing cards.
>
> or is a computer generated randomness of some sort,
> required to prevent known plaintext attacks?
You do need randomness for the key, but it doesn't have to be
computer generated. Key management is really a separate issue from
choice of cipher.
--Mike Amling
- Next message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: Using MGF1 for key generation"
- Previous message: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: Barcode Email"
- In reply to: vedaal: "*secure* (non-OTP) pencil and paper systems ?"
- Next in thread: Joe Peschel: "Re: *secure* (non-OTP) pencil and paper systems ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|