Re: Sometimes Terrorists can be Unimaginative

From: Regis (nobody_at_thisaddress.com)
Date: 07/31/05

  • Next message: Shannon Appel: "[SSL-Talk List FAQ] Secure Sockets Layer Discussion List FAQ v1.1.1" 
    Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 23:47:13 -0400

    On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 01:41:13 +0000 (UTC), Andrew Swallow
    <am.swallow@btopenworld.com> wrote:

    >Many years. The USA likes to look itself in the eye
    >when shaving. The British consider massacres "Not done,
    >Old chap.".

    If these were ordinary times, I would have no trouble agreeing with
    you.

    But the problem is, we're not living in ordinary times. The fanatical
    crazies in the world have decided to wage their "jihad" against
    everybody who doesn't convert to Islam. Their goal is not to
    negotiate with you or to sit down to tea and crumpets with you. Their
    goal is to kill you in large numbers because you're the "infidel", and
    in doing so, they're ensuring their place in heaven with their pervert
    of a god who has 72 virgins waiting for them.

    That is the type of mentality we're dealing with.

    So while you and I can sit here and hypothesize on the likelihood of
    some massive response against their jihad, the reality is that the
    only people that are capable of preventing such a thing from occuring
    are the fanatics themselves. It all boils down to one simple
    equation: if ever they do something as crazed as to detonate a
    nuclear device inside the U.S. or England where the death toll is no
    longer measured in the thousands, then they've essentially signed
    their own extinction papers. If and when such an event were to occur,
    I'm sure you'll quickly find that "Not done, old chap" will turn to
    "They started it...we finished it, old chap."

    ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
    http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
    ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

  • Next message: Shannon Appel: "[SSL-Talk List FAQ] Secure Sockets Layer Discussion List FAQ v1.1.1"