Re: Sometimes Terrorists can be Unimaginative

From: David Eather (eather_at_tpg.com.au)
Date: 07/30/05 

Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 01:02:24 +1000

Regis wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:44:35 -0400, "mechmech" <bbb@ccc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>now I have a question that maybe you can help with. Irak is now a terrorist
>>factory. Irak was not a terrorist factory before the war ( I know you won't
>>agree with the last statement so you better be ready to show numbers).
>
>
> Iraq is not a terrorist factory. The two main terrorist factories are
> Syria and Iran. That's been the case before the war, during the war,
> and after the war. Today, those same fanatics are crossing the border
> from those countries into Iraq. Other countries that are also
> breeding grounds for terrorists are Sudan, Somalia, Sauda Arabia,
> Pakistan, etc. For as long as these countries allow Muslim extremists
> to preach hate in their mosques, they will continue to be terrorist
> factories. This has always been the case, even long before Iraq was
> even an issue.
>
> Iraq itself produces a fraction of a fraction of the terrorists that
> run around killing people in that country. The native people of Iraq
> want to live in peace and freedom. This was demonstrated when more
> than 8 million Iraqis risked their lives when they went out to vote in
> their first democratic election in nearly half a century.
>
> The terrorists who are blowing up innocent women and children in Iraq
> today are not native to Iraq. This is common knowledge, even amongst
> those in the world who are in complete denial about everything else.
>
>
>
>>How come an army 100,000 strong cannot stop the making of
>>the terrorists. is-it because it's the direct consequence of the war that
>>destroyed the "social equilibrium "?
>
>
> No, it's because the U.S. doesn't run around destroying countries,
> even though the civilized world would be much better off without some
> of those countries.
>
> Islamic terrorists exist in the world because as of today, they're
> allowed to exist. But I guarantee you that this will change soon
> enough.
>
> Despite what many clueless morons believe, the U.S. is not this evil
> aggressor that everyone makes them out to be. If the U.S. decided to
> take it upon itself to completely rid the world of these terrorists
> and fanatics, it could be accomplished with virtually no U.S.
> casualties. It's called brute force. And if the goal of the U.S. was
> to unleash its brute force, the number of Islamic fanatics in the
> world would drop to about 0.0001% of what they're at today.
>
> The reason this doesn't happen is because unlike those fanatics, the
> U.S. really DOES care about not killing innocent women and children.
> This is the only reason there have been over 1800 American soldiers
> killed in Iraq, because the U.S. doesn't run around killing people at
> random. More than 1800 American soldiers died so that innocent Iraqis
> would live.
>
>
>
>>Now I also want someone to tell me why the US congress so often refuses to
>>fund decent programs in the US ( education....affordable housing...) and yet
>>they signed up to burn 200 billions on irak with very little or no return. I
>>can only dream of what 200 billions given to starved for funds scientists
>>can do.
>
>
> The U.S. has plenty of money allocated for all its necessary programs.
> Education, housing, employment -- all are doing just fine. There will
> always be people crying that they want more money thrown at various
> programs, but that's just life. You can please some of the people
> some of the time, but you can't please all of the people all of the
> time.
>
> And let's suppose for a second that $200 billion wasn't "burned" in
> Iraq. Let's say that all that $200 billion went to starved
> scientists. What do you suppose those starved-for-funds scientists
> would do if the U.S. did nothing but sit back and watch its borders
> become infiltrated with millions of crazed fanatics? How much
> scientific research do you think would be taking place when there
> would be September 11-type attacks taking place every week?
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Read some history then read some human rights reports - then you
might have something to say

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQuuWd5S9Fk5okqe7EQJNNACdEkNvA4LM0TT1Qvow39ptywLgQ3wAnj4i
YeYxYsyW5BWzYcwalk8xEt6p
=HXKB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Relevant Pages

  • Asshole Bush will say anything
    ... and Democrats, but a test of how gullible - and how divorced from ... and responding on cue when Bush ... disaster in Iraq. ... terrorists in Iraq will mean America's defeat and disgrace forever. ...
    (rec.sport.tennis)
  • Re: OT Deer Laurel
    ... Iraq to promote their cause.... ... the very terrorists that Bush ... attack and defend yourself easily against. ... long before the Bush administration), ...
    (alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers)
  • Bush lies, he knows hes lying, he wants his staff to give him lies so he can lie more
    ... For instance, in an Oct. 28 speech in Sellersburg, Indiana, Bush worked ... not wanting to "detain and question terrorists," not wanting to listen ... "Postwar findings do not support the judgment that Iraq was ... "prolonging the war" by keeping the Americans bogged down in Iraq. ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: OT Deer Laurel
    ... Qa'eda in Iraq to promote their cause.... ... suggest that Bush purposefully left this group in place so he could ... later use it as justification to start a war is laughable. ... They mentioned ties of these terrorists to Al Qa'eda. ...
    (alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers)
  • The Saddam-Al Qaeda Connection
    ... The recent revelation by Stephen F. Hayes in The Weekly Standard that Iraq ... terrorists in the years prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, ... the pre-war link between Saddam and the Al Qaeda terrorist network is not ...
    (alt.religion.islam)