Re: Sometimes Terrorists can be Unimaginative

From: Regis (nobody_at_thisaddress.com)
Date: 07/30/05 

Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:25:31 -0400

On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 19:44:35 -0400, "mechmech" <bbb@ccc.com> wrote:

>now I have a question that maybe you can help with. Irak is now a terrorist
>factory. Irak was not a terrorist factory before the war ( I know you won't
>agree with the last statement so you better be ready to show numbers).

Iraq is not a terrorist factory. The two main terrorist factories are
Syria and Iran. That's been the case before the war, during the war,
and after the war. Today, those same fanatics are crossing the border
from those countries into Iraq. Other countries that are also
breeding grounds for terrorists are Sudan, Somalia, Sauda Arabia,
Pakistan, etc. For as long as these countries allow Muslim extremists
to preach hate in their mosques, they will continue to be terrorist
factories. This has always been the case, even long before Iraq was
even an issue.

Iraq itself produces a fraction of a fraction of the terrorists that
run around killing people in that country. The native people of Iraq
want to live in peace and freedom. This was demonstrated when more
than 8 million Iraqis risked their lives when they went out to vote in
their first democratic election in nearly half a century.

The terrorists who are blowing up innocent women and children in Iraq
today are not native to Iraq. This is common knowledge, even amongst
those in the world who are in complete denial about everything else.

>How come an army 100,000 strong cannot stop the making of
>the terrorists. is-it because it's the direct consequence of the war that
>destroyed the "social equilibrium "?

No, it's because the U.S. doesn't run around destroying countries,
even though the civilized world would be much better off without some
of those countries.

Islamic terrorists exist in the world because as of today, they're
allowed to exist. But I guarantee you that this will change soon
enough.

Despite what many clueless morons believe, the U.S. is not this evil
aggressor that everyone makes them out to be. If the U.S. decided to
take it upon itself to completely rid the world of these terrorists
and fanatics, it could be accomplished with virtually no U.S.
casualties. It's called brute force. And if the goal of the U.S. was
to unleash its brute force, the number of Islamic fanatics in the
world would drop to about 0.0001% of what they're at today.

The reason this doesn't happen is because unlike those fanatics, the
U.S. really DOES care about not killing innocent women and children.
This is the only reason there have been over 1800 American soldiers
killed in Iraq, because the U.S. doesn't run around killing people at
random. More than 1800 American soldiers died so that innocent Iraqis
would live.

>Now I also want someone to tell me why the US congress so often refuses to
>fund decent programs in the US ( education....affordable housing...) and yet
>they signed up to burn 200 billions on irak with very little or no return. I
>can only dream of what 200 billions given to starved for funds scientists
>can do.

The U.S. has plenty of money allocated for all its necessary programs.
Education, housing, employment -- all are doing just fine. There will
always be people crying that they want more money thrown at various
programs, but that's just life. You can please some of the people
some of the time, but you can't please all of the people all of the
time.

And let's suppose for a second that $200 billion wasn't "burned" in
Iraq. Let's say that all that $200 billion went to starved
scientists. What do you suppose those starved-for-funds scientists
would do if the U.S. did nothing but sit back and watch its borders
become infiltrated with millions of crazed fanatics? How much
scientific research do you think would be taking place when there
would be September 11-type attacks taking place every week?

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT Deer Laurel
    ... Qa'eda in Iraq to promote their cause.... ... suggest that Bush purposefully left this group in place so he could ... later use it as justification to start a war is laughable. ... They mentioned ties of these terrorists to Al Qa'eda. ...
    (alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers)
  • Hell Yes We Should Pull Out Of Iraq Now – We Should Have Long Ago
    ... The Real Reason We Are Still There Has Nothing To Do With Terrorism or Democracy ... suggesting it was time to pack up and troops and come home from Iraq. ... It gives links to this article from before the war in which Murtha laid out ... nothing to do with terrorists or democracy. ...
    (soc.culture.iraq)
  • Re: The Missiles of August: The Lebanon War and the democratization of missile technology
    ... divorced from the radical islamists of today. ... terrorists are currently pitching themselves to the people while theys ... war, for the Ummah. ... American Democracy, just like Lebanon and Iraq, or the Muslim ...
    (sci.military.naval)
  • Re: OT Deer Laurel
    ... Iraq to promote their cause.... ... the very terrorists that Bush ... later use it as justification to start a war is laughable. ... attack and defend yourself easily against. ...
    (alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers)
  • Re: Military Brass prevents Bushs preemptive nuclear attack
    ... U.S. troops kill 10 insurgents in Iraq, ... Bush presents upbeat update of Iraq war ... gives us great satisfaction to see a rising body count of those we believe to be terrorists, all that it does in the end is to create more terrorists. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)