Re: Barcode Email

From: kurt wismer (kurtw_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: 07/30/05 

Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:12:44 -0400

Ari Silversteinn wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 14:52:53 +0000 (UTC), Walter Roberson wrote:
[snip]
>>it is difficult for
>>us to understand in what sense The Program is "better than" SHA-1.
>
> I never said it was better, I said SHA-1 is broken, mine is not.

liar, liar, pants on fire...

in <1oc4jmfpzwdbf$.vuhjik8z084c.dlg@40tude.net> you said
"Right now, it's better than SHA-1." 

-- 
"they threw a rope around yer neck to watch you dance the jig of death
then left ya for the starvin' crows, hoverin' like hungry whores
one flew down plucked out yer eye, the other he had in his sights
ya snarled at him, said leave me be - i need the bugger so i can see"

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Barcode Email
    ... liar, liar, pants on fire... ... "Right now, it's better than SHA-1." ... "they threw a rope around yer neck to watch you dance the jig of death ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: Barcode Email
    ... SHA-1 isn't broken yet. ... SHA is. ... existing cryptosystems that rely on it aren't automatically dead just ... "they threw a rope around yer neck to watch you dance the jig of death ...
    (sci.crypt)
Loading