Re: Multiple Encryption (was a lot of things)
From: Bryan Olson (fakeaddress_at_nowhere.org)
Date: 07/29/05
- Next message: Stefan Tillich: "Re: Barcode Email"
- Previous message: Unruh: "Re: Encryption Export Legality"
- In reply to: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Multiple Encryption (was a lot of things)"
- Next in thread: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Multiple Encryption (was a lot of things)"
- Reply: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Multiple Encryption (was a lot of things)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 06:55:29 GMT
Crypto@S.M.S wrote:
> The two "Joes" seem to think that redundancy is
> not worth the extra difficulty.
If so, the market agrees with them.
Do you really want to compete with Ritter Software Engineering
in the multiple-encryption market? He has quite a head start,
and even for the leader the revenue doesn't match a lemonade
stand.
-- --Bryan
- Next message: Stefan Tillich: "Re: Barcode Email"
- Previous message: Unruh: "Re: Encryption Export Legality"
- In reply to: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Multiple Encryption (was a lot of things)"
- Next in thread: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Multiple Encryption (was a lot of things)"
- Reply: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Multiple Encryption (was a lot of things)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|