Re: Digital cinema specification released.

From: Jan Panteltje (pNaonStpealmtje_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/28/05 

Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:21:01 GMT

On a sunny day (Fri, 29 Jul 2005 08:23:59 +1200) it happened none
<""bob\"@(none)"> wrote in <42e94328$1@news.auckland.ac.nz>:

>Some sources indicate that 70% + of "ripped" dvd's come from in house,
>ie stolen and realsed b4 the movie almost. ie its a internal security
>issue. This is true of "hacked" software as well.
>
>So this system will have little impact on that part of the market.
>
>Anyways the digital projector could be hacked, and you only need one bad
>operator.
>
>And last but not least... You could scramble the scaning with both the
>scan pattern and the "dwel" time of the pixels. Also digital cineras use
>more than one "element" (i think they use texas instruments mirror
>elements), that can really complicate the image grabbing. So then you
>would be left with using a tradtional camera. (from the projection booth
>;) )
Yes, I would personally also go for the sat link :-)
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account