Re: Why are there differences in the same algorithm?
From: Tom St Denis (tomstdenis_at_gmail.com)
Date: 07/20/05
- Next message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: GELI - disk encryption for FreeBSD - review request."
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Miller-Rabin primality testing question"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "Re: Why are there differences in the same algorithm?"
- Next in thread: Morten Dahl: "Re: Why are there differences in the same algorithm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 20 Jul 2005 05:17:31 -0700
Paul Rubin wrote:
> Regis <nobody@thisaddress.com> writes:
> > identical in both cases? If my passphrase is "test", and my plaintext...
> > In both test cases, AES was used as the algorithm with 128-bit key
>
> "test" is not a 128-bit string. Therefore it must have been converted
> into one somehow before it could be used as an AES key. Perhaps the
> two libraries did the conversion in two different ways.
Moreso the data after "test" in memory [the remaining 11 bytes since
"test" is five bytes in C] could be different.
Tom
- Next message: Pawel Jakub Dawidek: "Re: GELI - disk encryption for FreeBSD - review request."
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Miller-Rabin primality testing question"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "Re: Why are there differences in the same algorithm?"
- Next in thread: Morten Dahl: "Re: Why are there differences in the same algorithm?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|