Re: Shut up? [was re: <snip>]

From: ink (ink_at_nowhere.com)
Date: 07/19/05 

Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:28:51 +0200

<Crypto@S.M.S> wrote
>
<SNIP>
> No, I won't shut up, because John et al are indeed totally off the mark.
> And there are lots of people who want to deal with CryptoSMS, definitely
> more than there are posters in this newsgroup. And I base that remark
> on a comparison between the number of unique posters and the number of
> registered copies of CryptoSMS.
<SNIP>

Then why rant on and on here defending it? If it's so good, go out and sell
it, use your time better than wasting time here.

ink

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Terry says "Its over. Lets go home."
    ... original post. ... wasting time on a 3-page essay on why letting the game end as a tie, ... reaction to a perceived insult, I'm not sure why you perceived it ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox)
  • Re: Delay between CREATE DATABASE and ability to connect to that database
    ... You posted the same question and youy already received some answers ... please post to a single group only. ... wasting time on a problm that has already been solved. ...
    (comp.databases.ms-sqlserver)
  • Re: - best way to get police involved?
    ... There've been 702 unique posters here since 20 April 2006. ... impossible to say how many lurkers there are here, ... have met in real life) contribute 45% of the articles here. ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Winds order
    ... You did not stipulate that your comments were about other NG readers. ... would be wasting time. ...
    (rec.games.mahjong)