Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?

From: Joe Peschel (jpeschel_at_no.spam.org)
Date: 07/19/05 

Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 07:30:08 -0000

Crypto@S.M.S wrote in news:11dp8eotbau534f@news.supernews.com:

> Joe Peschel wrote:
>
>
>>>Metcalf, Jonez,
>>
>>
>> I don't know who Metcalf is. Jones has posted well-nigh nothing
>> significant, and mostly insults..
>>
>
> Jones has posted much that is significant, because he refuses
> to settle for your word and continues to demand proof of the
> claims made by you and your other "Joe".

Ha! You haven't been reading Jonez's posts. Don't be silly there is no
"your other Joe."
>
> Dane Metcalf? Posts a lot.

Not in sci.crypt, he doesn't

>>
>>>Ritter,
>>
>>
>> Ritter is not a cryptologist.
>>
>
> And by that you mean he has nothing to contribute to this discussion?

Not as an authority.

>
>>
>>>Unruh, and others who have posted
>>
>>
>> What did Bill say?
>>
>
> You can read his articles as easily as I.

What do you think he has posted that supports your view?

>>>
>>>Yeah right. You mean you like dry martinis when
>>>you post as Ashwood, and don't when you don't.
>>
>>
>> Ha!
>>
>
> Personally I prefer manhattans to martinis.

A Manhattan straight up is good once in a while.

>
>>
>>>Is it you, or your other Joe, who keeps writing "greek chorus"?
>>
>>
>> That's John Hadstate. You really are confused about who is posting,
>> aren't you?
>>
>
> No I'm not confused at all. That was me taunting you into another
> loop.

Don't be silly. Your pretending that I'm Hadstate isn't a way to taunt me.

J 

-- 
__________________________________________
http://www.impeach-bush-now.org
Joe Peschel 
D.O.E. SysWorks                                 
http://members.aol.com/jpeschel/index.htm
__________________________________________