Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?
From: Joe Peschel (jpeschel_at_no.spam.org)
Date: 07/19/05
- Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for criminals Re: just stupid?"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- In reply to: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Next in thread: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Reply: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 02:35:11 -0000
Joe Peschel <jpeschel@no.spam.org> wrote in
news:Xns9697D779E9CFCfa0khgj7ji8i8jo9@216.168.3.44:
> You certainly but a lot of faith in Ritter. Even he describes himself an
> engineer, not a cryptologist.
>
Oops! You cetainly put a lot of faith in Ritter.
J
-- __________________________________________ http://www.impeach-bush-now.org Joe Peschel D.O.E. SysWorks http://members.aol.com/jpeschel/index.htm __________________________________________
- Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for criminals Re: just stupid?"
- Previous message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- In reply to: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Next in thread: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Reply: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
