Re: Compression before encryption: cryptlib or zlib?
From: Joseph Ashwood (ashwood_at_msn.com)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:40:34 GMT
"Peter Gutmann" <email@example.com> wrote in message
> There shouldn't be any difference, since cryptlib implements the
> in RFC 2440 and RFC 3270, both of which specify the zlib format.
Ok, based on that I will revise my statement, I'd stick with cryptlib for
the compilation convenience.
> The cryptlib interface is rather simpler than the zlib one (push data into
> envelope, pop out the result), particularly for non-C languages. Since
> compression result is identical, it probably makes more sense to use the
> higher-level interface provided by cryptlib.
This just makes it even easier to decide. Thanks, I was treating them as
generic compression algorithms A and B, and deciding between them.