Re: Should be in crypto for criminals Re: just stupid?

From: \ (jonez_at_norcom.ca)
Date: 07/19/05


Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:30:05 -0600

Joe Peschel wrote:
> Crypto@S.M.S wrote in news:11do34me1apneda@news.supernews.com:
>
> > Joe Peschel wrote:
> > > " \"- Prof. Jonezę\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in
> > > news:_iSCe.29$Oa2.8639@news.uswest.net:
> > >
> > >
> > > > Joe Peschel wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Crypto@S.M.S wrote in news:11dn9mq82ci9n86@news.supernews.com:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Once these unfounded claims have been put to rest, then
> > > > > > maybe this thread will end.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hardly anyone in sci.crypt believes the claims of weakness are
> > > > > unfounded.
> > > >
> > > > Yet NONE of the crypto critics has been able to
> > > > crack such a weak, flawed cipher "in an hour" ...or
> > > > even in 650 hours,
> > >
> > >
> > > How do you know?
> > >
> > > J
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Because you are so intent on "winning" this discussion
>
> It's not a matter of my winning a discussion; it's a matter of your
> refusing to accept the profundity of Ashwood's cryptanalysis.

Without a crack, in the "one hour" he blustered about, there is
no profundity, just more unsubstantiated hot air from a crypto-blowhard.

>
> > that you would have posted the results if you had any.
>
> I'm not working on a ciphertext-only crack.

Been working more than "one hour" ...?

>
> J