Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?
From: \ (jonez_at_norcom.ca)
Date: 07/18/05
- Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Previous message: Ben Rudiak-Gould: "Re: The moving window or radar algorithm"
- In reply to: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Next in thread: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Reply: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 11:33:44 -0600
Joe Peschel wrote:
>
> Here's the entire graf:
>
> Certainly. Assuming a common passphrase length
> of around 20 characters, and assuming it is
> English, this will have 20-30 bits of entropy,
> MD5 will be enough to uniquely identify each
> of these, and MD5 can be effectively reversed
> under these circumstances in under 1 hour.
> This will yield the entire original passphrase,
> leading immediately to a complete compromise.
> So 1 hour.
>
" This will yield the entire original passphrase,
leading immediately to a complete compromise.
So 1 hour."
"This will yield the entire original passphrase,
leading immediately to a complete compromise.
So 1 hour."
Any questions?
- Next message: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Previous message: Ben Rudiak-Gould: "Re: The moving window or radar algorithm"
- In reply to: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Next in thread: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Reply: Joe Peschel: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|