Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?
From: Joe Peschel (jpeschel_at_no.spam.org)
Date: 07/18/05
- Next message: \: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Previous message: \: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- In reply to: \: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Next in thread: \: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Reply: \: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 06:18:31 -0000
" \"- Prof. Jonez©\"" <jonez@norcom.ca> wrote in
news:w2HCe.902$Bl2.8853@news.uswest.net:
> crack the CryptoSMS messages "in an hour" ... do it, jackass, or admit
> the Ashwood claim is absurd.
>
Joe didn't claim he could crack the three ciphertext messages in an hour.
Even Crypto@S.M.S knows that.
J
-- __________________________________________ http://www.impeach-bush-now.org Joe Peschel D.O.E. SysWorks http://members.aol.com/jpeschel/index.htm __________________________________________
- Next message: \: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Previous message: \: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- In reply to: \: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Next in thread: \: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Reply: \: "Re: Should be in crypto for John E. Hadstate Re: just stupid?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]