Re: A scheme of software protection
From: JiXian Yang (YJX_OnLine_at_126.com)
Date: 07/11/05
- Next message: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: Breaking RSA & Securing RSA"
- Previous message: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: Breaking RSA & Securing RSA"
- In reply to: Jan Panteltje: "Re: A scheme of software protection"
- Next in thread: Matt Mahoney: "Re: A scheme of software protection"
- Reply: Matt Mahoney: "Re: A scheme of software protection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 11 Jul 2005 07:13:47 -0700
Jan Panteltje wrote:
> Do I understand you build a virtual (soft) CPU with a differrent
> instruction set?
> That thing can be disassembled, and and then a debugger and disassembler
> written for it.
Thank you very much for your reply.
Some contents should be added to the paper when I found some reference
citations.
Suppose that there exist the debugger and disassembler and the
instruction set is not differrent, the effect might be:
...
Instruction_n;
Call Calculate_Offset_and_Jump;
Instruction_n+1;
Call Calculate_Offset_and_Jump;
Instruction_n+2;
Call Calculate_Offset_and_Jump;
...
Thanks again for you time.
Sincerely,
JiXian Yang
- Next message: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: Breaking RSA & Securing RSA"
- Previous message: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: Breaking RSA & Securing RSA"
- In reply to: Jan Panteltje: "Re: A scheme of software protection"
- Next in thread: Matt Mahoney: "Re: A scheme of software protection"
- Reply: Matt Mahoney: "Re: A scheme of software protection"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|