Re: Bank of America - On Line Banking *NOT* Secure?
From: Mike Amling (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 06/26/05
- Next message: Luc The Perverse: "Re: Simple Vocab Word"
- Previous message: sammy: "Re: crypto sms"
- Maybe in reply to: Neil - Salem, MA USA: "Bank of America - On Line Banking *NOT* Secure?"
- Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: Bank of America - On Line Banking *NOT* Secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 02:26:14 GMT
John E. Hadstate wrote:
> "Neil - Salem, MA USA" <Neil@Salem.Massachusetts.USA> wrote
> in message news:KdSdnVk_E_9LFCDfRVn-ig@comcast.com...
>
>>Could someone please check out Bank of America's web site
>>at http://www.bankofamerica.com and examine it for poor on
>>non-existent security?
>>
>>
>>"To provide the fastest access to our home page for all of
>>our millions of customers and other visitors, we have made
>>signing in to Online Banking secure without making the
>>entire page secure. Again, please be assured that your ID
>>and passcode are secure and that only Bank of America has
>>access to them."
>>
>>In other words, they are saying, "Trust us."
>
>
> You can still connect to https://www.bankofamerica.com/ but
> they immediately redirect you to
> http://www.bankofamerica.com/. From a cursory examination
> of the Javascript, it looks like the login information is
> submitted using an https connection to a cgi application.
>
> However small the probability, it appears that there is a
> security hole in the redirection to http. If someone else
> is spoofing the address www.bankofamerica.com, the page your
> browser loads may not be from BOA's servers. In this case,
> who knows what will happen when you enter a username and
> password. Hint: it probably won't be good for you.
Yes, and a MITM could just alter the downloaded javascript without
having to spoof the DNS. Some firewalls, not to mention all ISPs, are
capable of monitoring and changing http content.
> BOA is playing with fire. They are the bank who recently
> compromised the private information of a million Federal
> employees, including a US Senator or two. Being a customer
> of BOA, and having just received a letter from Citibank that
> my private information has been compromised, and being a
> customer of Wachovia who also has been compromised, I'm
> pretty fed up myself. There is just no excuse for this kind
> of thing.
I agree. Sounds like grist for Schneier's Cryptogram.
--Mike Amling
- Next message: Luc The Perverse: "Re: Simple Vocab Word"
- Previous message: sammy: "Re: crypto sms"
- Maybe in reply to: Neil - Salem, MA USA: "Bank of America - On Line Banking *NOT* Secure?"
- Next in thread: Tim Smith: "Re: Bank of America - On Line Banking *NOT* Secure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|