Re: crypto sms
From: \ (jonez_at_norcom.ca)
Date: 06/23/05
- Next message: \: "Re: crypto sms"
- Previous message: \: "Re: crypto sms"
- In reply to: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: crypto sms"
- Next in thread: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: crypto sms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:10:32 -0600
Crypto@S.M.S wrote:
> Joseph Ashwood wrote:
>
> > <Crypto@S.M.S> wrote in message
> > news:11bk5vg83mbkd9@news.supernews.com...
> > > One of the Sci.Crypt know-it-alls is currently attempting
> > > to break it, but failing at the challenge. He claimed he
> > > could do it in an hour, but it has been many days, although
> > > he isn't admitting defeat. Kudos for his tenacity.
> >
> >
> > Since I am the obvious "know-it-all" in question. I stated that it
> > is breakable in about 1 hour and gave real evidence of this because
> > of the weak passphrase usage. I have never claimed that I am
> > "attempting" to break it, I already broke it.
> >
> > Why would I admit defeat when your product was broken? Seems rather
> > a foolish thing to say.
> > Joe
> >
> >
>
> You have not broken anything.
> You have just made a bunch of wild claims
> and have expected others to believe them.
> This is the tenacity to which I was referring.
He's got a whole litter of sycophantic lapdogs and
mewling groupies that will swallow *anything* he
spews.
- Next message: \: "Re: crypto sms"
- Previous message: \: "Re: crypto sms"
- In reply to: Crypto_at_S.M.S: "Re: crypto sms"
- Next in thread: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: crypto sms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]