Re: New Encryption Idea
a.manansala_at_attbi.com
Date: 06/17/05
- Next message: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: bilinear pairing on curves where discrete log is easy"
- Previous message: fleegle.bananasplit.info: "Re: Whirlpool 512-bit collisions?"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: New Encryption Idea"
- Next in thread: Joseph Ashwood: "Re: New Encryption Idea"
- Reply: Joseph Ashwood: "Re: New Encryption Idea"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 17 Jun 2005 07:14:04 -0700
tomstdenis@gmail.com wrote:
> a.manans...@attbi.com wrote:
> > As I noted, secrecy is a problem with any encryption or security
> > system.
>
> You'll have to learn that "privacy" is not the only problem
> cryptography addresses...
>
> > The public key system must keep private keys secret where those keys
> > reside.
>
> Public key solves the problem you don't. Distribution.
>
The authentication keys in my system are based on existing private
knowledge. These keys basically have already been distributed so it is
not an issue.
This is quite plainly pointed out in the second article.
For example, one's credit card information would be an authenticating
key. The person requesting the information gets no actual credit card
data just the encrypted authentication code.
> > No, the files are electronic files that are downloaded from disk or
> > possibly from the internet if you have end-to-end security.
>
> Where does end-to-end security come from? And if I already have that
> why not use that instead?
>
Yes, that's another point I address. You don't have that. Except when
you can authenticate and encrypt initially with private knowledge.
That allows you to encrypt at both ends and not rely on servers.
> > Or they come already with your package like a new computer.
>
> So... now Dell knows your encryption keys?
>
Well, using the current system your "private keys" likely rests on
someone else's hardware.
Secrecy of the information is an issue, but not any greater here than
elsewhere. However, your encryption keys are not what is included with
the hardware.
The files included are used for random number generation.
Your authentication key is based on private knowledge.
The problem of distributing files is equivalent to that of distributing
credit cards, serial numbers, etc.
However, it is possible to use one file to create a completely new file
privately after the hardware has been received by the user.
Basically it goes like this, the user enters in some data. The program
uses the data to determine a random number. The random number is used
with the old file to generate an entirely new random file.
> > The key is basically information you have to type in anyway for
> > authentication.
>
> ... AES is usually not used for authentication outside of a MAC
> construction. Public Key algorithms are typically what you use to
> authenticate transactions for they have something MACs do not...
>
>
Well there is only one key that is "typed" in in my system and that is
the authentication key.
- Next message: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: bilinear pairing on curves where discrete log is easy"
- Previous message: fleegle.bananasplit.info: "Re: Whirlpool 512-bit collisions?"
- In reply to: tomstdenis_at_gmail.com: "Re: New Encryption Idea"
- Next in thread: Joseph Ashwood: "Re: New Encryption Idea"
- Reply: Joseph Ashwood: "Re: New Encryption Idea"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|