Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm
From: Mike Amling (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 06/01/05
- Previous message: Mike Amling: "Re: (new?) factorization technique"
- Maybe in reply to: David Eather: "Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm"
- Next in thread: David Eather: "Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm"
- Reply: David Eather: "Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 22:19:12 GMT
David Eather wrote:
> Just going over the stuff at the top of the post which seems to have
> sparked all this. Was it understood that addition of noise to a
> signal would/could/should be done like most other addition in crypto
> (mod something appropriate)?
If the OP's goal is to make some encrypted sound and recover a
plaintext from a recording of that audio ciphertext, I think he'd be
better off trying to digitize his message, encrypt it using normal
cryptographic methods and modulate the ciphertext into the sound wave
using robust analog techniques and error correcting codes, something
similar to what must be used by radio modems (or what's that
IP-over-ham-radio called?) that can bounce a signal off a
none-too-stable ionosphere and still recover the digital data.
--Mike Amling
- Previous message: Mike Amling: "Re: (new?) factorization technique"
- Maybe in reply to: David Eather: "Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm"
- Next in thread: David Eather: "Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm"
- Reply: David Eather: "Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]