Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm
From: Mike Amling (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 05/29/05
- Previous message: Bryan Olson: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- In reply to: David Eather: "Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm"
- Next in thread: David Eather: "Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm"
- Reply: David Eather: "Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 21:42:49 GMT
David Eather wrote:
>
> I think this is the hard way to do this - a good way that will get a
> perfect result, but still a hard way. The OP wanted to decrypt and
> identify the sound by ear, so it doesn't have to be bit perfect.
>
> Encode the sound stream by adding (not xoring) the stream cipher
> output.
This is dubious. If you add white noise to a recorded conversation,
it sounds like a conversation with tape hiss. Noise, which is what I
presume a stream cipher would sound like, has to be overwhelming before
a conversation becomes totally unintelligible.
> Decode is just receive the sound (normalise it first) and
> subtract the same stream cipher output. The result will probably
> have bit errors in most bytes but still have the identifiable sound.
--Mike Amling
- Previous message: Bryan Olson: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- In reply to: David Eather: "Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm"
- Next in thread: David Eather: "Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm"
- Reply: David Eather: "Re: Real-time sound cyphering algorithm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|