Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities
From: Andrew Swallow (am.swallow_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 05/24/05
- Previous message: David Gay: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- In reply to: Eric Cordian: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- Next in thread: Eric Cordian: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- Reply: Eric Cordian: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:29:09 +0000 (UTC)
Eric Cordian wrote:
> In sci.crypt David Gay <dgay@beryl.cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
>
>>I think this summarises the main problem with your argument. Languages
>>don't get popular without doing something right (and in fact, probably
>>something that no then-available language did right).
>
>
> It seems such an argument could also be applied to operating systems.
> What did MS DOS do right, particularly the early versions, around the
> time it became a billion dollar a year business?
1. MSDOS opens files, closes them, copies files, print files accepts
input from the user and runs programs. The rest is a luxury.
2. Microsoft accepted payment for DOS when the hardware was used to run
CPM and Unix.
Andrew Swallow
- Previous message: David Gay: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- In reply to: Eric Cordian: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- Next in thread: Eric Cordian: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- Reply: Eric Cordian: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|