Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities
From: Unruh (unruh-spam_at_physics.ubc.ca)
Date: 21 May 2005 22:21:10 GMT
Jean-Marc Bourguet <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>email@example.com (Greg Lindahl) writes:
>> What if I *want* 2 sets of operators? I definitely don't
>> want the precedence of && to be the same as &, either.
>Not the best thing to say when arguing in favor of
>C... there are two sets of operators but the precedences are
>a & mask == value || b & mask2 == value2
>is parsed as
>(a & (mask == value)) || (b & (mask2 == value2))
Anyone who does not put explicity brackets around an expression like that
is idiotic. If nothing else it makes the expression readable by people.