Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities
From: Nick Maclaren (nmm1_at_cus.cam.ac.uk)
Date: 05/18/05
- Next message: Mike Amling: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- Previous message: Greg Lindahl: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- In reply to: Colin Andrew Percival: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- Next in thread: Jan Vorbrüggen: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 18 May 2005 20:13:58 GMT
In article <d6fv9b$hrd$1@morgoth.sfu.ca>,
Colin Andrew Percival <cperciva@sfu.ca> wrote:
>In comp.arch D. J. Bernstein <djb@cr.yp.to> wrote:
>> Obviously not. A typical developer doesn't even _consider_ writing
>> programs in Lisp, for example, even though that would vastly improve his
>> chances of writing secure code.
>
>I'm not sure I agree here. Code written in Lisp is less likely to
>contain buffer overflows, certainly, but it is probably far more likely
>to be vulnerable to timing attacks.
Plus people can write ghastly code in any language, and are likely
to be lulled into a false sense of security.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
- Next message: Mike Amling: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- Previous message: Greg Lindahl: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- In reply to: Colin Andrew Percival: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- Next in thread: Jan Vorbrüggen: "Re: Public disclosure of discovered vulnerabilities"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|