Re: Structure of Primes
From: Pubkeybreaker (Robert_silverman_at_raytheon.com)
Date: 05/16/05
 Next message: JeanLuc Cooke: "Re: HyperThreading Considered Harmful"
 Previous message: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: Structure of Primes"
 In reply to: SHorvat: "Re: Structure of Primes"
 Next in thread: SHorvat: "Re: Structure of Primes"
 Reply: SHorvat: "Re: Structure of Primes"
 Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 16 May 2005 07:34:51 0700
Hi,
Before I comment further, may I ask your level of math education and
the intended purpose of your paper?
I mean no disrespect, but you spend many pages of "discussion"
describing mathematics that is trivially explained in just a few
sentences.
Much of your notation is contrary to commonly accepted notation.
Stop inventing words like 'strand', 'base of each strand', 'additive
primes',
'subtractive primes' etc. The fact that all primes except 2,3 are +1
or 1 mod 6
is trivial. You spend far too much time and weird notation discussing
this.
I also ask you: what about composites that are NOT of the form(s) you
specified?
As for your discussion about 'lattices', may I suggest that you look
up the concept of
'ideal'???
As for your *repeated* queries, they have already been answered.
 Next message: JeanLuc Cooke: "Re: HyperThreading Considered Harmful"
 Previous message: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: Structure of Primes"
 In reply to: SHorvat: "Re: Structure of Primes"
 Next in thread: SHorvat: "Re: Structure of Primes"
 Reply: SHorvat: "Re: Structure of Primes"
 Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
