Re: Hyper-Threading Considered Harmful
From: David Kanter (dkanter_at_gmail.com)
Date: 05/13/05
- Next message: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: Hyper-Threading Considered Harmful"
- Previous message: Juuso Hukkanen: "Re: ecc implementation in delphi"
- In reply to: Colin Percival: "Re: Hyper-Threading Considered Harmful"
- Next in thread: Francois Grieu: "Re: Hyper-Threading Considered Harmful"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 13 May 2005 07:48:13 -0700
> Well, this attack only targets Hyper-Threading -- dual cores aren't
> a problem. (Ok, let me rephrase that: Dual cores might be a problem,
> but I don't have any evidence to suggest that they are.)
>
> Since the performance benefit of Hyper-Threading is fairly minimal
> on most of the applications which run on multi-user systems,
disabling
> htt isn't quite as bad as it sounds.
>
> > We'll have a brave new world of side channel attacks.
>
> We need to convince Intel and AMD to hire lots of cryptographers and
> get them involved in CPU design. :-)
I think you might find this article interesting:
Apparently, AMD does not encrypt their BIOS update mechanisms.
David
- Next message: Stephen Sprunk: "Re: Hyper-Threading Considered Harmful"
- Previous message: Juuso Hukkanen: "Re: ecc implementation in delphi"
- In reply to: Colin Percival: "Re: Hyper-Threading Considered Harmful"
- Next in thread: Francois Grieu: "Re: Hyper-Threading Considered Harmful"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|