Re: Crypto Algorithm Calling Interfaces

From: David Wagner (daw_at_taverner.cs.berkeley.edu)
Date: 05/13/05


Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 08:55:04 +0000 (UTC)

BRG wrote:
>At the risk of starting a flame war, I would be interested to hear
>people's preferences _and_ their rationale for their choice.

I don't have any strong opinions, but:
Have you considered something like the following?
    AES_encrypt(out, in, context);
    AES_cbc_encrypt(out, in, nblocks, key, iv);
Rationale: this ordering of parameters is intended to be parallel
to the order of parameters to memcpy(), strcpy(), etc.