Re: How strong would randomizing data be ?
From: Joseph Ashwood (ashwood_at_msn.com)
Date: 05/03/05
- Next message: Joseph Ashwood: "Re: Cascading different algorithms?"
- Previous message: John: "Looking for a simple and free, public key, win32 command line encryptor/decryptor"
- In reply to: Skybuck Flying: "Re: How strong would randomizing data be ?"
- Next in thread: Unruh: "Re: How strong would randomizing data be ?"
- Reply: Unruh: "Re: How strong would randomizing data be ?"
- Reply: Skybuck Flying: "Re: How strong would randomizing data be ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 08:44:14 GMT
"Skybuck Flying" <nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d570at$128$1@news4.zwoll1.ov.home.nl...
> The question is if there is such a thing as true randomness ;)
>
> In the end everything happens because of some sort of system ;)
This is actually a somewhat open area of debate, no one has successfully
proven that entropy exists, but at this point the theories suggesting it
does not do not appear accurate.
As to the strength of your "design" it is almost certainly flawed, and you
haven't even given details. The reason is rather simple, you need to choose
cryptographically strong pRNGs and these are in short supply unless you use
a good block cipher in CTR mode. Either way you've over designed and under
engineered, especially in security.
As others have noted you have basically reinvented the stream cipher, albeit
in a rather convoluted way. You really don't need all the layers you have
and your reasons behind creating the design can be easily dealt with
otherways, the short problem is dealt with through padding. That you are
using ECB is easily addressed by switching modes, etc.
Joe
- Next message: Joseph Ashwood: "Re: Cascading different algorithms?"
- Previous message: John: "Looking for a simple and free, public key, win32 command line encryptor/decryptor"
- In reply to: Skybuck Flying: "Re: How strong would randomizing data be ?"
- Next in thread: Unruh: "Re: How strong would randomizing data be ?"
- Reply: Unruh: "Re: How strong would randomizing data be ?"
- Reply: Skybuck Flying: "Re: How strong would randomizing data be ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|