Re: AES is not a group
From: Gregory G Rose (ggr_at_qualcomm.com)
Date: 04/29/05
- Next message: Tom Giarmo: "Re: Beale Treasure is buried behind my house"
- Previous message: Scott \: "Re: AES is not a group"
- In reply to: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: AES is not a group"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: AES is not a group"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 29 Apr 2005 14:23:07 -0700
In article <1114804456.341659.22010@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
Pubkeybreaker <Robert_silverman@raytheon.com> wrote:
>Proving that AES is not a group does not suffice to prove that AES
>isn't closed under composition. AES might be closed under composition,
>but not be a group.
True, but proving that it is *not* closed would
also prove that it isn't a group, which is what
proved that DES does not form a group.
I'm not aware of any proof corresponding to that
for DES, but my memory is telling me that there is
some other way to be sure that AES is not a group.
But whatever it was, just isn't coming to me. Not
very helpful, I know :-(.
Greg.
-- Greg Rose 232B EC8F 44C6 C853 D68F E107 E6BF CD2F 1081 A37C Qualcomm Australia: http://www.qualcomm.com.au
- Next message: Tom Giarmo: "Re: Beale Treasure is buried behind my house"
- Previous message: Scott \: "Re: AES is not a group"
- In reply to: Pubkeybreaker: "Re: AES is not a group"
- Next in thread: Bryan Olson: "Re: AES is not a group"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|