Re: RC4 for Authentication and Encryption

From: Gregory G Rose (ggr_at_qualcomm.com)
Date: 04/29/05

Next message: mensanator_at_aol.compost: "Re: Factoring problem and the SFT"
Previous message: Juuso Hukkanen: "Re: Factoring problem and the SFT"
In reply to: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: RC4 for Authentication and Encryption"
Next in thread: aweston_at_connectfree.co.uk: "Re: RC4 for Authentication and Encryption"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Date: 28 Apr 2005 18:00:17 -0700

In article <slrnd72v07.1jqe.usenet@stoneport.math.uic.edu>,
D. J. Bernstein <djb@cr.yp.to> wrote:
>David Wagner wrote:
>> * distinguishing attacks that would totally disqualify any new stream
>> cipher proposal, but are somehow treated as acceptable for RC4
>
>Speaking of new stream-cipher proposals, what are people submitting to
>the ECRYPT Stream Cipher project? http://cr.yp.to/snuffle.html has my
>own submission.

Our two submissions are at
http://people.qualcomm.com/ggr/NLS-SSS.html

regards,
Greg.

-- 
Greg Rose
232B EC8F 44C6 C853 D68F  E107 E6BF CD2F 1081 A37C
Qualcomm Australia: http://www.qualcomm.com.au

Next message: mensanator_at_aol.compost: "Re: Factoring problem and the SFT"
Previous message: Juuso Hukkanen: "Re: Factoring problem and the SFT"
In reply to: D. J. Bernstein: "Re: RC4 for Authentication and Encryption"
Next in thread: aweston_at_connectfree.co.uk: "Re: RC4 for Authentication and Encryption"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]