Re: Who cares?

From: Richard Henry (rphenry_at_home.com)
Date: 04/22/05 

Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 20:24:52 -0700

<jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1114121445.346858.278570@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> I go out to look at replies and I wonder to myself why I bother.
>
> I was at one point talking about a theorem that I think is not only
> interesting mathematics, but oh, by the way, it solves the factoring
> problem, but in reply there are all these snide remarks from people
> trying to emphasize that my idea isn't valuable and doesn't solve the
> factoring problem.

Perhaps you can answer in your own words: what exactly is "the factoring
problem"?

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Proof factoring solution is closed form
    ... > Whether your approach to factoring leads to anything remains to ... JSH recently even seemed to agree that method doesn't always work. ... reality don't bother you, ya, lots of things are arguably poly-time. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Proof factoring solution is closed form
    ... > Whether your approach to factoring leads to anything remains to ... JSH recently even seemed to agree that method doesn't always work. ... reality don't bother you, ya, lots of things are arguably poly-time. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result
    ... > and not even bother with T^2, ... Everyone knows that factoring T^2 is much harder than factoring ... Best regards, ... Jose Carlos Santos ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Surrogate factoring, surprising result
    ... > and not even bother with T^2, ... Everyone knows that factoring T^2 is much harder than factoring ... Best regards, ... Jose Carlos Santos ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Who cares?
    ... > I go out to look at replies and I wonder to myself why I bother. ... but in reply there are all these snide remarks from people ... > trying to emphasize that my idea isn't valuable ...
    (sci.crypt)
Loading