Re: Surrogate factoring, mapping, hyperbolas
From: Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium (QncyMI_at_netscape.net)
Date: 04/21/05
- Next message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: cryptological confusion"
- Previous message: mm_at_nospam.net: "Re: Primes algorithm"
- In reply to: Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium: "Re: Surrogate factoring, mapping, hyperbolas"
- Next in thread: Nora Baron: "Re: Surrogate factoring, mapping, hyperbolas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 21 Apr 2005 13:32:48 -0700
also note that two conics intersect in at most 4 points;
you can see that with a cicle & ellipse on the same center.
Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium wrote:
> the hyperbolae don't intersect, if
> they're "mapped" on the same plane?...
> some of that "elliptical curve stuff is
> just drawing secants through the curve,
> to get 3 points.
thus:
b) the hare-brained analysis of WTC7 assumes
that the substructure of the complex,
which included a large subway station,
was not affected by the two largest buildings,
falling down into it.
--Chair Man George NAND Strep Throat @ W'gate?
http://tarpley.net/bush12.htm
http://laroucehpub.com
- Next message: Gregory G Rose: "Re: cryptological confusion"
- Previous message: mm_at_nospam.net: "Re: Primes algorithm"
- In reply to: Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium: "Re: Surrogate factoring, mapping, hyperbolas"
- Next in thread: Nora Baron: "Re: Surrogate factoring, mapping, hyperbolas"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]